Rabu, 18 Januari 2012


Dipetik sepenuhnya dari rakan bloger Kulaan Niring, menulis dan melaporkan seperti berikut:-

Insiden ‘bunyi aneh dan menakutkan’ dari langit yang kedengaran di Kota Samarahan, Sarawak pada 11 dan 12 Januari lalu kini mendapat perhatian antarabangsa apabila artikel mengenainya yang disiarkan di The Borneo Post mula dibincangkan secara hangat di dalam internet di seluruh dunia. Pada yang belum tahu, sehari sebelum kejadian pada waktu mejelang Subuh itu berlaku, terjadi perkara yang sama di Aaborg, Denmark. Bahkan bunyi aneh dan menggerunkan tersebut pernah direkodkan di Sweden pada 1 November tahun lalu The Borneo Post tempoh hari melaporkan satu bunyi aneh telah kedengaran di Kampung Meranek, Kota Samarahan yang mencetuskan ketakutan dan kegelisahan penduduknya.Tidak lama selepas bunyi itu kedengaran, satu kejadian gempa bumi kuat (7.3 skala Richter) berlaku di Sumatera, Indonesia.Bagaimanapun masih tidak dapat dipastikan sejauh mana kaitannya antara bunyi aneh itu dan kejadian gempa bumi tersebut.sila rujuk di sini : http://www.theborneopost.com/2012/01/15/rumble-in-the-sky-over-samarahan/ Ini bunyi yang berjaya direkodkan oleh salah seorang penduduk: Sementara itu Timbalan Menteri Sains, Teknologi dan Innovasi, Datuk Fadillah Yusuf tidak mahu terus membuat konklusi mengenai perkara itu.Katanya, beliau perlu terlebih dahulu mendapatkan maklumat saintifik mengenainya daripada Jabatan Metrologi.Selain daripada kejadian gempa bumi di Sumatera itu, ada juga teori yang mengaitkan bunyi aneh itu dengan sebuah program yang dikenali sebagai High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme (HAARP)HAARP adalah program penyelidikan berkaitan ionosfera dan dinaungi sepenuh oleh US Air Force, US Navy, University of Alaska dan Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency(DARPA).DARPA adalah sebuah agensi yang ditubuhkan oleh kerajaan Amerika Syarikat untuk membina pelbagai senjata berteknologi tinggi untuk kegunaan ketenteraan Amerika Syarikat.HAARP berselindung dengan aktiviti penyelidikan saintifik yang kononnya menyelidik lapisan ionosfera bagi meningkatkan lagi penggunaan sistem komunikasi dan pemantauan cuaca.Tapak penyelidikan HAARP yang berada di Gakona, Alaska menempatkan peralatan berteknologi tinggi iaitu Ionospheric Research Instrument(IRI).IRI adalah sebuah instrumen yang menghasilkan frekuensi radio berdefinisi tinggi sekitar 2.7MHz sehingga 10MHz.IRI mampu memancarkan frekuensi ke lapisan yang terhad untuk dicapai iaitu di lapisan Ionosfera dan menghantar kembali isyaratnya ke bumi.Apapun sehingga kini, belum ada jawapan jelas mengenai apa sebenarnya yang berlaku di Kota Samarahan dan beberapa buah kawasan di dunia tempoh hari. Yang pasti, bunyi yang aneh dan menggerunkan itu akan terus menghantui penduduk selagi tiada jawapan yang jelas mengenainya
Menariknya bunyi yang sama turut di dengar di beberapa tempat di dunia pada tarikh yang sama. Ianya sedang di buat kajian. Semakin hampir ke saat yang dijanjikan pelbagai perkara anih terjadi. Semuanya kehendak dan di atas kekuasaan Allah subhanahu-wa-ta'ala jua.



Keynote address by YAB Dato Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak, Prime Mnister of Malaysia at the opening of the Global Movement of Moderates Conference, at the Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre, Kuala Lumpur from January 17th to 19th, 2012.

2. Here in Malaysia, moderation has always been our chosen path. It is a testament to how we gained our independence from the British back in 1957; how we restored our relations with Indonesia in 1965; and how we helped build ASEAN in 1967, recovered from the tragic events of May 1969, engaged with China in 1972, and forged the ground-breaking ASEAN security and economic communities in 1993 and 2009. Each was a significant moment for our country, and all were gained through reasoned discussion and debate.

3. But over and above Malaysia’s own achievements, moderation is the fitrah, or essence, of humanity’s greatest heights; the solid bedrock on which all of the world’s civilisations have been built – for without it, we would long ago have succumbed to epicurean pleasures and delights! Yet moderation stands not just in the defence of willpower, discipline and restraint but of acceptance, freedom, tolerance, compassion, justice and peace.

4. Being moderate is not about being weak, about appeasement or about institutionalising mediocrity. And it is not about doing half-heartedly those things that are worthy of our fullest measure of devotion. Far from being an ideology of enfeeblement, as some would have us believe, moderation empowers us to go forward and to leave a mark for good – attending to the needs, frustrations and anxieties of others at the same time as attending to our own.

5. In the words of Robert F. Kennedy, “it is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centres of energy and daring, those ripples build a current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.”

6. That, ladies and gentlemen, is the current we are here to build today – and let us make no mistake, we come together at a particularly troubled juncture in our global history. New faces of war, the global financial crisis and natural disasters on a previously unseen scale present us with challenges the like of which we have never had to face before. But face them we must, and the way we choose to deal with these changes will have a crucial bearing on the future of our shared civilisation.

7. The scale and speed of the events that unfolded across the Middle East and North Africa in 2011 at times felt almost overwhelming, but as the chaos and confusion gives way to calm the whole world is united in the hope that – rather than falling victim to an extremism and intolerance that closes in to fill the void – these countries and peoples can forge a peaceful, democratic moderation that will grant them more freedom of expression, not less.

8. Elsewhere, Nigeria has recently borne witness to deadly clashes between its Christian and Muslim communities. But the Nigerian government has made it quite clear that such behaviour will not stand and that there will be consequences for those who seek to hijack faith for violent ends. Because the real divide is not between Muslims and non-Muslims, or between the developed and developing worlds, it is between moderates and extremists.

9. So we have, each one of us, a choice to make: the choice between animosity and suspicion on the one hand and a sustained attempt to apprehend each other’s world views on the other. Certainly, we should never assume that the oceans and gulfs that divide us grant us immunity to the conflicts of others. Tensions in Africa or harsh words uttered in the Americas can have consequences not only for those who live there but for us all. In today’s world of the information superhighway such conflicts travel quickly – and no-one has a monopoly on truth.

10. Of course – much as it would be nice to claim the credit! – calls such as my own for a Global Movement of the Moderates are nothing new. Moderation is an age-old value, and one that runs right to the heart of the great religions. In Islam, the Prophet Muhammad counsels that “moderation is the best of actions”; in Christianity, the Bible says “let your moderation be known unto all men”; and in Judaism, the Torah teaches that moderation in all things is a “way of life” in the truest sense of Jewish custom.

11. But if moderation has long had a home within the world religions, then the reverse is also true: extremism has never been welcome inside our mosques, churches, synagogues and temples. Perpetuating hatred is, by its very nature, a lonely pursuit, flying in the face of widely held morality – and it is this dangerously untethered animus, coupled with a head-in-the-sand refusal to acknowledge the views and the values of others, that makes extremism such a potent threat.

12. And yet, time and again the side of righteousness has triumphed. History has been made not by those who espoused extremism but by those who, without surrendering their beliefs, stayed true to the path of moderation. We are all familiar with the extraordinary strength of will and leadership of Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela and Aung San Suu Kyi, but you don’t have to be a world leader to be an inspiration. Moderates can make a difference wherever they make a stand – and it is time for the massed ranks of the moderates everywhere to stand up and to say to the extremists with a single breath a firm, resounding “no”.

13. Because one thing is clear: we cannot rid the world of extreme views by force. Violence begets violence – so we can best foster tolerance and understanding not by silencing the voice of hatred but by making the voice of reason louder. Persuasion, negotiation and co-operation: these must be our weapons in the face of enmity and malice.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

14. The range of speakers and delegates here today is diverse in every sense, embracing experts and thought leaders from all continents and walks of life. This can, I think, mean just one thing: that extremism has at some point affected every country, every profession and everyone. No-one is immune, nowhere is out of bounds and nothing is off limits – for the simple reason that extremists, with their totalising world views, are reluctant to leave any institution, sacred or secular, untouched. 

15. Extremists, we know, are driven by orthodoxies – a set of messianic ideals characterised by crass simplifications, misrepresentations and outright lies. Rather than celebrating the sanctity of life, as is required by all religions, extremists emphasise the glory of the afterlife. Rather than seeking out and embracing difference they espouse ignorance, intolerance and introspection. And rather than embracing change they fear it and all who drive it, turning their backs on progress and seeking refuge in an idealised world that always stays the same.

16. The essence, and perhaps the attraction, of extremism is its apparent simplicity – so it falls to movements and gatherings like this one to interrogate these easy truisms with subtlety, intelligence and vigour.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

17. Talk of extremism and extremist acts conjures up terrible images of murder, mayhem and human suffering, but extremism isn’t always violent – and I believe we literalise it at our peril. Take, for example, one of the most extreme yet ostensibly non-violent events in recent history: the global financial crisis.

18. Compared to the shockingly violent images that were beamed around the world in the wake of 9/11 – scenes of devastation on an epic scale that scarred a generation and seared the collective conscience of the world – the pictures taken outside Lehman Brothers on another September morning some years later were much more ordinary, familiar even. A young woman, tense and anxious, carries her belongings out of the firm’s headquarters in a box. A disgraced executive, walking quickly, climbs into his luxury car and speeds away. 

19. Nothing too unusual or untoward – and yet, without a single bullet fired, the extremes and excesses of Wall Street would in a matter of days take the world as we knew it to the brink. 

20. Fast forward four years and it is clear there is no end in sight. The eurozone is still in crisis. Countless millions have lost their jobs, their homes and their security. And in addition to the human cost, some US$14 trillion has so far been spent on the rescue plan – ten times the cost of the wars in Afghanistan and in Iraq combined. 

21. So if my call for moderation is idealistic, it is hard-headedly realistic too. Many great Islamic scholars have been concerned with how Islam as a religious, cultural, political, ethical and economic worldview can help solve some of the biggest challenges we face today, and these are also questions that interest me – how moderation can solve not only the problem of violent extremism but can guide us through this global economic crisis. 

22. Thomas Jefferson once said that “the selfish spirit of commerce knows no country, and feels no passion of principle but that of gain.” It is a sentiment that has been revisited many times in the years and months since Lehman’s fell. 

23. No less a figure than the Pope has blamed the global financial crisis on “the lack of a solid ethical foundation for economic activity.” Britain’s Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks has written of the need for employers, bankers and shareholders to be “guided, even if no-one is watching, by a sense of what is responsible and right.” And for Muslims like myself, the structures and principles of Islamic finance have long put public good ahead of individual gain. 

24. So how do we create a truly moderate global economy that works in the interests of the many not the few? How can we devise a system that delivers fairness for “the 99 per cent”, not just those at the top? Quite simply, we can no longer allow the workings of the markets to be value-free or value-neutral. Markets, we all know, are the only route to rising global prosperity and sustained, stable growth – but we must do away with the unjust, unfair outcomes they can produce when left unchecked, and with the kinds of reckless economic practices that brought our global financial system to its knees.

25. Massive overleveraging. Mind-boggling credit default swaps. Subprime lending. Like the monstrous creation of some crazy scientist, these new and poorly understood financial practices rampaged out of Wall Street and left the devastated lives of millions in their wake. 

26. But what of the men and women, the bankers and the traders, who went about their work with such abandon and with so little thought for anything beyond their own enrichment? A line of mug shots of the culprits would look very different to the “rogues gallery” of extremists we have grown accustomed to in recent years – sharp-suited, desk bound and clean shaven rather than dark skinned, bearded and combat-trained. 

27. This flies in the face of everything we have been told about extremism – but it also raises the important question: what do extremists look like? How can we come to know them? The answer, of course, is that extremists, like extremism itself, take many forms – and we can only know them by their acts.

28. It is something I believe the world would do well to remember, for too often in recent times we have seen extremism and Islam discussed in the same breath. In the aftermath of 9/11, for example, Southeast Asia came to be regarded as a 'second front' simply because it had the highest number of Muslims in the world. And yet terrorism has never gained the same grip here that it has secured in other parts of the world. 

29. And when a great evil visited Norway last year, so-called experts filled the airwaves to assert that the attack bore all the hallmarks of Muslim extremists. We swiftly discovered that the awful truth was very different, yet around the world politicians, journalists and commentators remain committed to the idea that terrorism and Islam are two sides of the same coin. 

30. After Timothy McVeigh brought mass slaughter to the streets of Oklahoma City, nobody suggested that all Christians were somehow responsible. To do so would rightly have been seen as absurd, yet that is the situation the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims find themselves in today. 

31. How did this happen? How did acts of extremism by a tiny minority of Muslims come to be seen as a true reflection of the whole of the Islamic faith – and to overshadow the extremism that is being perpetrated right across the world, day in day out, by people of all faiths and none? Such pernicious views cannot be left unchallenged – and it is not enough to say, as many have done, that the solution to extremism is simply for more Muslims to speak up and speak out. We need to hear from moderates of all religions in all countries and from all walks of life – and when we do, the prize of peace is there for all to see. 

Ladies and Gentlemen,

32. Malaysia has long been synonymous not with extremism but with moderation, tolerance , inclusivity and even acceptance.. In a predominantly Muslim country with substantial communities of Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, Taoists and Sikhs, we know well the “dignity of difference”. We have many ethnic groups, many religions, but we continually strive to be a harmonious and truly united nation predicated on the values of moderation and the spirit of 1Malaysia.

33. We know that we are best and we are strongest when we actively embrace our differences rather than just putting up with them – and it is in that spirit that we come together at the first ever meeting of the Global Movement of the Moderates. But a truly global movement cannot be imposed from above – so we must awaken in all our countries and communities the triumph of truth over ignorance, falsehood and fear. 

Ladies and gentlemen,

34. To advance our common cause, I am pleased to announce today the formation here in Malaysia of an Institute of Wasatiyyah, operating as part of the Prime Minister’s Office, to further the pursuit of moderation and balance in all its aspects – respect for democracy, the rule of law, education, human dignity and social justice. In the words of the great scholar Al-Imam Ibnul Qayyim, wasatiyyah – moderation or ‘balance’ – “neither being too lenient nor too extreme is like an oasis between two mountains”, and to encourage many more such scholars in the future we will also be creating an academic Chair of Wasatiyyah, operating under Universiti Malaya, with the postholder to be announced in due course.

35. To spearhead this work at an international level, I am delighted to announce the launch of a new Global Movement of the Moderates Foundation as a centre of first resort for the consolidation and dissemination of information and campaign materials to all those who want to join the fight against extremism, governmental and non-governmental bodies alike. Certainly it is essential that, rather than being an exclusive initiative by Malaysia, the GMM complements other initiatives for global dialogue and co-operation such as the United Nations Alliance of Civilisations.

36. It will not be a campaign for the faint hearted, but we cannot allow this moment to be overtaken by extremists, with those who shout loudest gaining the most. In the words of that great advocate for peace, Mahatma Gandhi, “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” – so it is for moderates everywhere to stand firm and stand proud, to dissipate the pull of the extremes and to deny those at the margins a foothold on the middle ground, ensuring that frustrations, wherever they are felt, are heeded and that voices, wherever they speak out, are heard. 

37. Certainly, I hope this inaugural conference will provide an opportunity for us to brainstorm, debate and explore some of the practical challenges ahead – questions like: What does it take for a set of ideas and values to become a truly global movement? How can we inject moderation into our foreign policy decisions and domestic economic measures? And what can we learn from each other in the promotion of understanding, tolerance and peace?

Ladies and gentlemen

38. Maybe I am na├»ve to hope for a world without terror, intolerance and all of the hatreds and miseries that man inflicts on man – but the price of failure if we dream too small is simply too high to pay. So let us dare to dream big, let us dare to imagine what was once thought unimaginable, and yes, let us dare to answer the clarion call to action. Oppression and tyranny can only win out if good men and women stand idly by, unwilling to turn rhetoric into action and opinions into deeds. 

39. So let us here, today, together, commit ourselves to change and begin the task of building a new coalition of the moderates for our times – and may I thank you once again for coming and wish you well in your discussions over the next few days. There has never been a more important conversation, and it is one that we must undertake with temperance, fortitude and courage



Betul juga apa yang Ummi Hafilda katakan. Familinya berpecah belah kerana gara-gara Anwar Ibrahim. Ibunya merintih kerana kehilangan anak lelaki bernama Azmin Ali. Ramai lagi berpecah belah kerana Anwar Ibrahim. Begitu ekstrim Anwar Ibrahim memecahbelahkan famili para pengikutnya.Bahkan ramai lagi famili menjadi mangsa Anwar Ibrahim. Hamba pernah mejadi saksi kepada perkahwinan semula seorang rakan yang mentalakkan isterinya semata-mata kerana Anwar Ibrahim kemudian merujuk semula setelah Anwar Ibrahim dibebaskan pada tahun 2004. Orang PAS. Begitulah. Diharapkan akaq Wan Jijah tidak lagi memekakkan telinganya dengan rayuan-rayuan sebegitu.



Papa Gomo menulis :-

MAHAFIRAUN = Tun Dr Mahathir

Itulah gelaran yang telah diberikan oleh pakatan Pembangkang sewaktu Tun Dr Mahathir mantan Perdana Menteri Malaysia yang telah memimpin negara kita selama hampir 22 tahun yang mana juga merupakan Perdana Menteri paling lama setakat ini.

Ayahnda Tun M diasak cukup hebat sepanjang beliau mentadbir negara malah diperingkat kemuncaknya zaman reformasi sekitar tahun 1998 -1999 pelbagai gelaran yang beliau perolehi yang mana bukan setakat Mahafiraun, Mahazalim malah banyak lagi kata kata yang dilemparkan kepada beliau kerana Timbalan Perdana Menterinya Anwar Ibrahim dipecat waktu itu kerana salah guna kuasa dan masaalah moral Homoseksual.

Tun M berjaya mengharungi rintangan tersebut dengan bantuan dari pemimpin Kerajaan waktu itu terutamanya dari UMNO sendiri walaupun yang menentang beliau tidak kurang juga datangnya dari UMNO sendiri. Malah keluarga beliau sendiri menyokong penuh Tun M dan sentiasa mendmpinginya dari saat ke saat sewaktu tomahan dan fitnah besar melanda beliau waktu itu.

Tun M Suksess dan berjaya dalam saat mencabar tersebut walaupun Barisan Nasional kehilangan banyak kerusi pada PRU 10 pada tahun 1999. Syukur buat Tun Mahathir Negarawan Ulung negara.

Baca seterusnya di sini PAPA GOMO



Lepas jadi pocong Adam Adli bawa geng ke PWTC. Polis sedang menunggu. Inilah saja kepandaian SMM. Buat demo buat kecoh.



Akhirnya Adam Adli ......... .......

Depa kata nak serbu PWTC tapi tak jadi sebab cuma ada 10 orang pondan sahaja. Jadi nak lepas geram depa serkup Adam Adli bungkus dengan kain kafan gantung depan ibupejabat PAS di Jalan Raja Laut. (berita reka) (Berita betul camni....)

sekumpulan ahli SMM cuba melakukan flash mob di depan SOGO tetapi gagal kerana diketahui oleh polis. Kemudian mereka merancang mahu ke PWTC dengan azam Adam Adli mahu menaikkan 'bendera' lagi. Pun gagal. Jadi terpaksalah mereka mengantungkan 'harapan' mereka yang disimbolkan oleh Pocong itu. Macamana pocong itu begitulah harapan dan perjuangan sia-sia mereka. 



Rakan bloger Tenggara Is Southeast menulis:-
Sah...PAS memang dah tak layak lagi untuk bercakap tentang Islam. Perlantikan Exco baru Selangor yang mengisi kekosongan jawatan exco yang kosong akibat pemecatan Hasan Ali hanyalah sebagai exco yang menjaga adat Melayu, belia dan sukan. 
Kah...kah..kah...Khalid Gagap yang jaga portfolio Islam pulak. Tak apa... mana-mana yang dia tak faham, dia boleh tanya Teresa Kok. Nak tanya orang PAS dah tak ada yang layak! 
Kesimpulannya ialah memang benarlah DAP di belakang kegiatan murtad yang dilakukan oleh DUMC. Kesimpulan seterusnya ialah:-
  1. PKR dan DAP tidak pernah menganggap PAS sebagai sekutu yang setaraf; 
  2. PAS sememangnya diperkudakan oleh PKR dan DAP untuk sokongan sahaja; dan 
  3. Perjuangan Islam di tolak oleh PKR dan DAP; dan 
  4. ISLAM bakal dibakulsampahkan oleh PKR dan DAP; dan 
  5. PAS tidak diiktiraf oleh PKR dan DAP sebagai pakar agama Islam; dan 
  6. Habislah kesepakatan antara PAS-DAP-PKR.
  7. Membuktikan bahawa UMNO sahajalah yang benar-benar memperjuangkan ISLAM aliran Ahlissunnah wal Jamaah.
Beginilah berakhirnya kesepakatan antara DAP-PKR-PAS. 



Dalam isu Anwar Ibrahim menghalalkan liwat, Dr Novandri menulis:- 
Pelbagai pihak telah memberi reaksi tentang keterbukaan Anwar Ibrahim tentang undang-undang homoseksual di negara ini. Begitu juga dengan NGO seperti Majlis Peguam dan IBAHRI yang mahu menghalalkan aktiviti LGBT. MiM melihat keterbukaan memperjuangkan seks songsang ini sebagai satu penghinaan yang nyata kepada agama Islam.Yang paling menyedihkan ialah trend tersebut disokong oleh pemimpin Islam sendiri yang semakin terdesak mendapatkan sokongan walau pun trend tersebut melanggar pegangan agama beliau. Penganut Islam di negara ini semakin dicabar secara terang-terangan. Bukan sahaja dicabar tetapi sebenarnya telah diludah oleh mereka itu!
Apa yang kita mahu buat?
1. Penasihat Majlis Agama Islam Negeri Johor, Datuk Nooh Gadot berkata, ini kerana tindakan itu jika dilakukan dengan akal yang waras sama seperti menghina dan merendahkan hukum Allah SWT.
‘‘Amalan sejenis LGBT ini adalah sesuatu yang keji, kotor, jijik dan dilarang serta ditegah oleh Islam.
‘‘Sesiapa juga yang menghalalkan hukum ini sama ada melalui al-Quran dan hadis juga ijma’ ulama perlu bertaubat nasuha dan kembali mengucap dua kalimah syahadah,” katanya kepada Utusan Malaysia di sini hari ini.
2. Bekas Fellow Pusat Syariah, Undang-Undang dan Sains Politik, Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia (IKIM), Mohd. Roslan Mohd. Saludin menilai, kenyataan Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim mengenai undang-undang homoseksual negara itu bermotifkan politik iaitu mengharapkan sokongan daripada kumpulan yang berfikiran sekular serta liberal.
Anwar juga kata beliau, cuba menonjolkan kepada masyarakat dunia terutamanya Barat bahawa beliau boleh bersifat terbuka dalam perjuangan hak asasi manusia termasuk dalam soal hubungan sejenis meskipun perkara itu jelas ditolak oleh semua agama.
“Di negara ini kenyataan seperti itu mungkin boleh memberikan kelebihan politik daripada sekumpulan kecil kelompok masyarakat, tetapi bagi mereka yang waras ia adalah satu kenyataan yang melampau,” katanya.
3. Ahli jawatankuasa Pertubuhan Muafakat Sejahtera Masyarakat Malaysia (Muafakat), Ismail Mina Ahmad berkata, undang-undang mengenai homoseksual tidak sepatutnya dipertikai kerana perbuatan itu ditegah oleh semua agama.
Sambil menyifatkan hubungan sejenis itu merupakan kesalahan yang diketahui meskipun oleh kanak-kanak, beliau berkata, orang dewasa yang menyokong perbuatan itu boleh dianggap terkeluar daripada Islam kerana menolak hukum Allah.
“Justeru saya menasihati umat Islam di negara ini agar tidak menunjukkan sokongan kepada gerakan yang cuba menghalalkan hubungan sejenis termasuk memilih pemimpin yang cenderung menyokong aktiviti seperti itu,” katanya - UM. 
 Sebagai jawapan kepada pertanyaan Dr Novandri ' Apa yang kita mahu buat? " kita pakat Buat Bodoh je lah ........



Rakan bloger Semuthitam menulis:-

Halamak!!! Apa cerita ni? Dengar kata Dr. Abdul Rani tu GAGAL dalam permainan psikologi dia untuk merebut jawatan sebagai Exco Negeri.

Sebelum ni, Dr. Rani dah cakap yang dia tak kisah jika tidak dilantik sebagai Exco Kerajaan Negeri Selangor yang baru bagi menggantikan Datuk Dr. Hassan Ali.

Tapi puak - puak PAS Selangor julang nama dia bagai nak rak mengharapkan agar dia sangkut jawatan tersebut. Sekali, hampa belaka semuanya.

Dikalangan ahli - ahli PAS lain pun dah tau yang kenyataan Dr. Rani sebelum ini hanya taktik dia untuk tidak dilihat beria - ia sangat nak jawatan tu. Semuanya wayang belaka.

Sekarang, wayang dia tu dah jadi kenyataan. Jadi buat rugi je la dia seru ahli - ahli PAS agar turun menyokong Si Ketua Penipu tu meliwat sebelum ni!!!
KUALA LUMPUR, 18 Jan — Kejutan berlaku di Istana Bukit Kayangan, Shah Alam apabila Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (Adun) Sijangkang Dr Ahmad Yunus Hairi dilantik sebagai exco kerajaan negeri menggantikan Datuk Dr Hasan Ali.Keputusan itu dilihat mengenepikan calon pilihan ramai iaitu Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor Dr Abdul Rani Osman.Ahmad Yunus mengangkat sumpah jawatan dan taat setia di hadapan Sultan Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah pagi ini dengan disaksikan Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim dan barisan ahli majlis mesyuarat yang lain.Sebelum ini PAS Selangor sebulat suara mencadangkan Abdul Rani yang juga Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (Adun) Meru untuk menggantikan Hasan, bekas Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor yang dipecat keanggotaannya.Semalam Setiausaha PAS Selangor Mohd Khairuddin Othman menafikan dakwaan bahawa perselisihan dengan Istana akan menjejaskan peluang Abdul Rani dilantik exco.Utusan Malaysia semalam menyebut Abdul Rani berkemungkinan menghadapi kesukaran untuk mendapat perkenan Sultan Selangor bagi dilantik sebagai exco berikutan pertikaiannya berhubung isu tauliah mengajar selain kritikan beliau terhadap pengagihan bantuan zakat oleh Majlis Agama Islam Selangor (MAIS) kepada kerajaan negeri Perlis.“Kita (PAS Selangor) sebulat suara mencadangkan pesuruhjaya (Abd Rani) untuk menggantikan Dr Hasan dan setakat ini kita lihat tiada masalah dengan cadangan itu.“Kita hanya berikan satu nama sahaja kepada kepimpinan PAS pusat, tapi kita masih belum dapat sebarang maklumat terbaru daripada PAS pusat dan juga menteri besar,” kata Mohd Khairuddin.Abdul Rani menjadi calon pilihan untuk menggantikan Hasan yang sebelum ini memegang jawatan Pengerusi Hal Ehwal Islam, Adat Melayu, Infrastruktur dan Kemudahan Awam.
Ps: Rasa - rasanya, Exco baru ni mampu ke tidak nak menjalankan tugas yang ditinggalkan oleh Datuk Dr. Hassan Ali dalam menegakkan Islam? Kalau nak harapkan orang lain, tunggu kiamat pun diorang takkan mampu!!! 
Habislah UMNO Kuala Langat. Dr Ahmad Yunus di lantik menjadi EXCO dan Ketua Pemuda PAS Kuala Langat orang impot dari Kelantan bakal memastikan jawatan itu kekal di pegang oleh ADUN PAS yang menang dalam DUN Sijangkang. Patah Iskandar dengan penyelaras Parlimen Kuala Langat agak-agaknya boleh tak korang impot orang BTN pegawai Kelantan jadi calun nak lawan Dr Ahmad Yunus?



Serangan balas dari penyokong pro Hasan Ali di portal PAS, Tranungkite Online. Berikut adalah senarai yang termasuk dalam golongan parasit PAS.

Ini baru Ahli Parlimen. Belum lagi ADUN dan yang berjawatan dalam parti.

Geng parasit ni sendiri mengaku sokong Nik Aziz tapi tolak Haji Hadi. 

*UMNO tak payah campur pun tak pe. Orang PAS sendiri yang akan bongkarkan parasit dalaman PAS. Kita tunggu je la ye.




UMNO SELANGOR masih mengharapkan keajaiban dari melakukan keajaiban. Sebenarnya ramai di dalam UMNO Selangor begitu berbakat dan mempunyai banyak potensi melakukan keajaiban. Malangnya mereka tidak mempunyai semangat kental dan jatidiri yang kuat. Mereka lebih selesa duduk diam dan menerima arahan daripada mengeluarkan arahan dan bertindak di atas inisiatif sendiri. Terlalu takutkan kritikan dan teguran. Terlalu bimbang dipersalahkan dan di sabotaj oleh pihak lain. Terlalu takutkan reaksi negatif. Enggan keluar dari pemikiran kotak biasa. Enggan mencuba perubahan drastik. Tidak mahu berfikiran positif. Gagal memahami gerak kerja berterusan di atas satu-satu isu. Enggan bersikap asertif dalam menyampaikan mesej. Terlalu skeptik dengan kebolehan dan kemampuan sendiri. Hanya bergantung harap kepada UMNO Pusat untuk melaksanakan strategi dan gerak kerja. 

Tidak ramai ahli dan pemimpin UMNO Selangor belajar dan menganjurkan lagi program untuk ahli dan pemimpin mereka sendiri. Kebanyakan pengisian program UMNO Selangor lebih kepada meraba-raba mencari pengertian dan halatuju perjuangan. Jentera tempur siber UMNO Selangor pula lebih banyak memperomosikan kumpulan mereka daripada UMNO sendiri. Jadi sampai bila-bila pun sokongan kepada UMNO tidak bertambah.

Ya ramai akan marah dan mencemik bibir. Biarkanlah. Hamba tidak bernaung dan memperjuangkan untung nasib sesuatu grup tempur siber UMNO. Hamba memperjuangkan untung nasib UMNO itu sendiri bukan pemimpinnya, bukan ahlinya dan bukan jentera partinya. Ramai juga akan melemparkan pelbagai tuduhan nanti. Itu hak mereka. Bukan hamba yang hendak bertanding sebagai calun pun di dalam PRU 13 atau merebut sebarang jawatan di dalam UMNO Selangor. Kebenaran itu amat pahit.



Rakan bloger WZWH menulis:-
Sebenarnya jika kita kaji sehalusnya trend pola PRU Malaysia sejak 1969 adalah konsisten sifatnya. Rakyat Malaysia tidaklah menolak atau menghukum seseuatu parti hingga ke dasar laut.

Analoginya seperti air laut ada masa air pasang ada ketika air surut.

PRU 1969, sokongan kepada Perikatan (BN)  merosot tapi PRU 1974 BN bangkit kembali.

PRU 1978, 1982, 1986, 1990, 1995 BN menguasai secara total politik Malaysia

PRU 1990, faktor Ku Li (Semangat 46 pada masa itu) buat BN kehilangan Kelantan selamanya.

PRU 1999, faktor Anwar Ibrahim juga buat BN kemerosotan pengaruh.

PRU 2004, BN pula mendapat kemenangan terbesar dalam sejarah-landslide victory. Rakyat Malaysia mahu beri mandat baru kepada Tun Abdullah. Kelantan hampir dikuasai BN.

PRU 2008, sebaliknya rakyat tidak puas hati dan menghukum BN hingga 4 negeri selain Kelantan jatuh kepada Pakatan Rakyat.

Berdasarkan trend pola PRU Malaysia di atas maka diramalkan PRU 2012/2013 nanti, rakyat Malaysia akan beri peluang dan mandat baru kepada DS Najib Tun Razak.
 Baca seterusnya di sini WZWH

Pada pendapat hamba pula majoriti senyap pengundi Malaysia sememangnya rasional dan waras. Namun kempen berterusan oleh Pakatan dan Anwar berjaya mempengaruhi sebahagian pengundi muda tidak berfikir secara rasional dan mengikut emosi.

Barisan Nasional masih belum berjaya mempengaruhi minda sebahagian besar pengundi muda. Kebanyakan program penerangan oleh Mat Maslan masih bersifat syok sendiri. Manakala program oleh Saipudin Dollah dan Khaled Nordin tidak banyak membantu mempengaruhi minda mahasiswa/i. Seterusnya, tindakan lembik oleh H20 lebih banyak membantu Pakatan mencapai matlamat mereka. 

Selama ini penentu undi hanya 5% tapi pada PRU 13 pihak yang mampu menguasai 7% perbezaan akan menang. Mari kita tonton klip video ini.

"The only thing necessary fotr the triumph of EVIL (Pakatan Sosialis) is for good men (Barisan Nasiona) to do nothing"

"Kejujuran ialah sumber tenaga kuasa sakti kebenaran. Tanpanya kebenaran tidak mampu ditegakkan. Dengannya sejuta fitnah terancang mampu dimusnahkan walaupun bersendirian"



"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil (Pakatan Sosialis) is for good men (Barisan Nasional/UMNO) to do nothing" 
Edmund Burke [1729-97]

Anwar Ibrahim menyaman Utusan Malaysia kerana menyiarkan kenyataan Hasan Ali. Anihnya, Anwar Ibrahim tidak mahu ke menyaman Malaysian Insider di atas lapuran yang sama? 

Anwar Ibrahim tidak mahu menyaman Saiful Bukhari ke? Kita semua maklum Anwar Ibrahim amat gemar melakukan ugutan-ugutan sebegitu malah samannya ke atas Tun Dr Mahathir gagal samasekali. DS Najib pula begitu berhemah kerana tidak pernah menyaman mana-mana pihak dan individu daripada Pakatan yang memfitnah beliau. Kesimpulannya, adakah kita mahu seorang seperti Anwar Ibrahim yang memimpin satu pakatan jahat dan tidak boleh menerima kritikan sebagai Perdana Menteri? Minta dijauhkan. Lihat klip video di bawah ini.



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...